Wednesday, September 02, 2015

The Frontstretch Newsletter: Jennifer Jo Cobb Gets Fined, More Darlington Schemes Announced

THE FRONTSTRETCH NEWSLETTER
Presented by Frontstretch.com
The Best Seat at the Track, The Best View on the Net!
Sep. 2, 2015
Volume IX, Edition CLIV
~~~~~~~~~~
What to Watch: Wednesday

- It appears to be a relatively quiet day in NASCAR.  The Jennifer Jo Cobb penalty (see below) has already been announced.  Look out for more "throwback" schemes to be unveiled in advance of Sunday night's Southern 500.

~~~~~~

Wednesday's TV Schedule can be found in Couch Potato Tuesday here.

Top News
by the Frontstretch Staff

NASCAR Issues Penalties to Jennifer Jo Cobb for Having Phone in Truck

Tuesday, just as we noted would happen in the Newsletter, NASCAR came down hard on Jennifer Jo Cobb for having her cell phone inside her truck last weekend.  NASCAR considers that infraction to be a P3 violation.  Cobb has thus been fined $7,500, the normal $5,000 fine, plus a modifier for violating probation for her previous fine at Dover.  Read more

Truex to Promote National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month at Darlington

Furniture Row Racing announced Tuesday that Martin Truex, Jr.'s No. 78 Chevrolet will carry a special paint scheme this weekend to promote Ovarian Cancer Awareness.  The scheme, which features teal ribbons, is in honor of his girlfriend, Sherry Pollex, who has been fighting ovarian cancer.  Read more

BK Racing Partners With Beds for Kids at Darlington

BK Racing announced a new partnership on Tuesday with the non-profit Beds for Kids.  The Charlotte area non-profit will be on JJ Yeley's No. 26 Toyota this weekend.  Read more

Josh Berry Joins JR Motorsports at Richmond With Sponsorship From Speedco

JR Motorsports announced Tuesday that development driver Josh Berry will drive the No. 88 Chevrolet at Richmond International Raceway. Sponsorship will be provided by Speedco.  Read more

Have news for The Frontstretch? Don't hesitate to let us know; email us at phil.allaway@frontstretch.com with a promising lead or tip.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Today's Featured Commentary
Trying Hard or Hardly Trying?
Professor of Speed
by Mark Howell

How far can a sport go to draw an audience?

During the days of Ancient Rome, it was easy. Scatter a few mock sea battles in with your chariot races and you were good to go. If you happened to dismember a slave or three during a slow stretch, all the better.

Toss a few loaves of bread to the hungry fans in the stands and your event would be considered a success. Folks would talk about the spectacle for weeks afterward and eagerly await the next go-round.

It looks like automobile racing has taken a similar tact. Bear baiting it isn't, but motorsports circa 2015 have taken some interesting paths in an effort to find loyal viewers. And I use the term "viewers" because it seems as though television ratings mean just as much (if not more) than attendance numbers.

Ask NASCAR why it no longer releases attendance figures, yet television numbers are tallied, totaled, and treated like the gospel according to Nielsen.

Among the citizens of NASCAR Nation, the writing has been on the wall for many years, at least since 2004 and the debut of the Chase for the Championship. It has been part of the All-Star Race at Charlotte for years, as well. Think back to inverted starting grids during Race Week in May, spinning wheels-of-fortune to specialty races divided up into shootouts and sprints and trophy dashes for big cash.

Dare we assume that the myriad rule changes and packages we've seen this year in the Sprint Cup Series are merely more of the same? Are they not other attempts at turning lackluster racing into must-see broadcasts? If it's Indianapolis, it must be the high-drag package. If it's Kentucky, it must be a low-downforce weekend.

At least the Southern 500 has been moved back to Labor Day weekend and declared to be another low-downforce race. Maybe there's hope for that venerable old event after all given its rightful place on the schedule and use of the more competitive (and more popular) aerodynamic configuration.

So maybe it's no surprise that IndyCar racing dabbled in the audience-focused style-over-substance arena this season. It's not like IndyCar has been above such behavior in years past. Remember the split race at Texas Motor Speedway in 2011? Remember the inverted fields? Probably not.

So did the awarding of double points at both Indianapolis and Sonoma help IndyCar build its overall fan base? Did the television ratings jump and did merchandise fly off shelves? Have teams and fans complained loudly enough? Sure, the season title chase in IndyCar came down to a dead heat in points, followed by a tiebreaker based on 2015 wins (which gave Scott Dixon the championship over Juan Pablo Montoya), but did such a gimmick truly help the sport?

Maybe IndyCar needed an emotional boost coming off its year of serious injury and a death. Winding up with a tie in points (no matter how those points were accumulated) should be good for business, should it not?

For a reference point, consider Tony Stewart's/Carl Edwards' battle for the Cup title back in 2011. Smoke smoked the competition during the final ten races that season to tie Edwards in points. Stewart took the championship in the tiebreaker with five wins to Carl's one.

So is that how we got to the revised, win-and-in Chase format of 2014? When are good rules good enough? Or does racing require more than its fairly basic structure of complete-the-laps-first-and-you-win administration?

Given recent efforts in IndyCar, and given recent changes we've seen in NASCAR, maybe speed alone isn't quite enough. Maybe running hard and earning points is not enough. Maybe we've entered a cycle where spectacle and spectators trump the sport?

Not that all efforts to produce a great show go unappreciated. Notice the success of the Camping World Truck Series on a road course in Canada last weekend. Notice the challenge of XFINITY cars at Road America. Think back to earlier this summer and the thrill of the NCWTS on the dirt at Eldora. There is still a need for some level of spectacle in professional sports. Just don't jeopardize the realities of true competition by changing formats and manipulating how titles are eventually won.

If you're not going to race for racing's sake, at least toss us some loaves of bread….

Dr. Mark Howell is a contributor for Frontstretch. He can be reached via e-mail at mark.howell@frontstretch.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TODAY AT FRONTSTRETCH:

by Greg Davis

by Amy Henderson
by the Frontstretch Staff

compiled by Brett Winningham
~~~~~~~~~~
FRONTSTRETCH TRIVIA:

Q: In 1997, Darlington switched the frontstretch and the backstretch, resulting in the current track setup.  Why was this move made?

Check back Thursday for the answer, here in the Frontstretch Newsletter!

Tuesday's Answer:

Q:  The 1990 Heinz Southern 500 was a very hot day and Dale Earnhardt capitalized on that heat to claim his third Southern 500 victory (second in a row).  Points leader Mark Martin had a disastrous start to the race.  What happened?

A:  A couple of laps into the race, Martin and Alan Kulwicki collided in turn 1 and spun onto the apron.  Greg Sacks, driving in place of the injured Darrell Waltrip, also spun and just missed Martin.  The incident can be seen here.

Luckily, none of the cars involved were damaged.  Martin would eventually recover and finish sixth while Kulwicki ended the day in third.  Sacks would later be eliminated in a wreck.
~~~~~~~~~~
COMING TOMORROW
In The Frontstretch Newsletter:
We'll have any news that breaks in the world of NASCAR. In addition, Phil Allaway gives his own thoughts on BEING: Stewart-Haas Racing.

On Frontstretch.com:
Toni Montgomery returns with another edition of Nitro Shots.
-----------------------------
Talk back to the Frontstretch Newsletter!
Got something to say about an article you've seen in the newsletter? It's as easy as replying directly to this message or sending an email to editors@frontstretch.com. We'll take the best comments and publish them here!
©2015 Frontstretch.com

--
--
Feel free to forward this newsletter if you have any friends who loves
NASCAR and great NASCAR commentary. They can subscribe to the Frontstetch by visiting http://www.frontstretch.com/notice/9557/.
 
If you want to stop your Frontstretch Newsletter subscription, we're sorry
to see you go. Just send an email to
TheFrontstretch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com from the address that you
recieve the Frontstretch Newsletter.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Frontstretch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to thefrontstretch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Post a Comment