Presented by Frontstretch.com
The Best Seat at the Track, The Best View on the Net!
Apr. 1, 2015
Volume IX, Edition XLIV
Wednesday's TV Schedule can be found in Couch Potato Tuesday here.
by the Frontstretch Staff
Crew Chief Luke Lambert Suspended By NASCAR Following Tire Violation
NASCAR's independent investigation into tire manipulation has found its first victim. On Tuesday, NASCAR announced that the No. 31 team was guilty of a P5 penalty for tire manipulation. As a result, Ryan Newman has been docked 75 points, while crew chief Luke Lambert and two other crewmembers have been suspended for six points races. Read more
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FRONTSTRETCH JOB: WEBMASTER
Frontstretch.com is looking for a talented and motivated individual to fulfill the role of the site's webmaster. The ideal candidate must be highly proficient in WordPress, as the site recently converted from Textpattern to WordPress as the content management system. The webmaster will assist with leftover conversion tasks, work with the management team to implement site enhancements and help troubleshoot problems as they arise. The candidate must also have a working knowledge of search engine optimization strategies to help improve search rankings for the site. Motorsports knowledge is preferred, but not required. The candidate should have on average at least 1-2 hours per week to devote to Fronstretch initiatives. If you are interested, please contact our Business Manager, Tony Lumbis at Tony.Lumbis@gmail.com.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Professor of Speed
by Dr. Mark Howell
Call me naïve, but I have never really believed that NASCAR has forsaken good in exchange for evil.
That's not to say I've never publicly complained about the sanctioning body and its decision-making processes over the decades. Every organization is fully capable of making poor choices, but that's also to be expected when said organization is competing for audience and market share.
Taking the occasional risk is part of doing business, especially in the world of professional sports. A questionable trade, an unusual hire, or a controversial rule change is part of that culture, and it's what gives us fans in the stands something to debate.
Such decisions, and audience responses to them, explain the existence of sports talk radio.
My motivation for this week's newsletter essay was the fallout that came from a comment I made in last week's "Friday Faceoff" column at Frontstretch. In response to a question about NASCAR's policy for throwing caution flags late in races, I wrote that I considered such suspected "phantom cautions" to be nothing more than part of NASCAR folklore; I compared belief in such actions to fixing race outcomes, and I suggested that fans believing in NASCAR's duplicity should stop following the sport.
Suddenly, I was singled out as a company man – just another media minion who supported NASCAR and its profit-above-all-else-minded administration.
Now that I think about it, maybe I am….
As I get older, my mindset seems to lean more toward the path-of-least-resistance. From my aging/tired/defeated perspective, I see NASCAR as focused on creating the most exciting and engaging motorsports experience possible.
If stock car racing is a sport, and sports are entertainment, and entertainment is a product to be produced, packaged, and sold to interested audiences, then NASCAR is most certainly a product.
As such, products need to undergo periodic revision, adaptation, and reinvention, and NASCAR is no different. Think about the addition and/or deletion of divisions we've seen during the sport's nearly seventy-year history: the "Strictly Stock" era of 1949, the convertible division, initial attempts at both "roadster" and "modified" series, the Camping World Truck Series, and CASCAR. Spend seven decades in the entertainment business and you'll see your fair share of change.
Not that all changes to our collective popular culture are wise ones. Anybody remember New Coke?
Over the past decade, NASCAR Nation has seen changes by the bushel: the newly-structured Chase format that evolved out of the original (2004) Chase for the Championship, the incorporation of electronic fuel injection, the Car of Tomorrow, mandatory use of the HANS device, a switch to double-file restarts, the "Lucky Dog" option, and adoption of the "knockout" qualifying process – a process that'll be revised (luckily) when we return to Talladega and Daytona.
Change may not be regarded as inherently good, but it's a necessary evil….
The question is: does NASCAR mandate changes solely to generate more money? It's no surprise that competition changes echo decreases in both fan attendance and television ratings. Folks grumbled about Matt Kenseth winning the 2003 Cup title after just one win that season and suddenly we were staring down the barrel of this thing called "The Chase for the Championship" and its revised points system.
Ditto during the 2014 season when NASCAR modified the Chase into its current "win-and-in"/elimination-focused road to Homestead. Race teams, race fans, and the racing media may have lamented the new format, but come December, the casual consensus decreed that the controversial changes were for the better.
Jump ahead to last Sunday's Cup race at Martinsville. As the checkered flag flew over Denny Hamlin's door-to-door, closing lap victory against Brad Keselowski, radio audiences heard NASCAR Hall of Famer Rusty Wallace praise the new rules package for 2015. Wallace declared the package an unqualified success; reducing downforce and horsepower made drivers a greater part of the competitive equation on the famed short track.
We've heard similar comments each week since the new rules went into effect, even though the results thus far have been dominated by only a few names. This leads me to wonder if NASCAR really made the right decision when it decided to tweak the rules following Daytona. Each manufacturer has at least one win after six events and no single team has dominated Victory Lane, so maybe parity in the Sprint Cup Series is within reach.
But then, don't take it from me. It's been suggested that I'm a media minion who bows at the altar of the all-knowing Brian France.
I just hope Rusty moves over to give me some room….
Dr. Mark Howell is a contributor for Frontstretch. He can be reached via e-mail at mark.howell@frontstretch.com.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~TODAY AT FRONTSTRETCH:
Tuesday's Answer:
Q: The mid-1990s in Formula One were characterized by somewhat sketchy race cars and constant driver changes due to funding. One of those pay drivers that came into the World Championship during that time was Taki Inoue with first Simtek, then Footwork. While Inoue never lit the world on fire with his driving, he did have an unusual incident at the Hungaroring. What happened?
COMING TOMORROW
Got something to say about an article you've seen in the newsletter? It's as easy as replying directly to this message or sending an email to editors@frontstretch.com. We'll take the best comments and publish them here!
©2015 Frontstretch.com
--
Feel free to forward this newsletter if you have any friends who loves
NASCAR and great NASCAR commentary. They can subscribe to the Frontstetch by visiting http://www.frontstretch.com/notice/9557/.
If you want to stop your Frontstretch Newsletter subscription, we're sorry
to see you go. Just send an email to
TheFrontstretch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com from the address that you
recieve the Frontstretch Newsletter.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Frontstretch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to thefrontstretch+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment